An Analysis of employee involvement on American Water Company Essay

An Analysis of employee involvement on American peeing Company - Essay ExampleAn Analysis of employee involvement on American Water CompanyStaw & Ross stated that employees know ruin what is expected of them, and they point better on the organizations decision (1978). EmployeeParticipation may lower the disutility of effort, by providing indispensable motivation (Staw, 1980). Also, participation may suit non-financial needs such as achievement, creativity and the longing for respect. This may also develop cooperation and communication employees discuss with from each one other instead of allowing all discussions only to the management, saving management time. When employees are participative, they tend to supervise themselves, therefore reducing the need for a lot of managerial positions and lessening costs of labor. Involvement teaches employees new skills and helps identify and train leaders. Strauss emphasized that participation increases loyalty and identification with the o rganization. He also argued that If participation and rewards lease place in a group setting, the group may pressure individuals to conform to decisions (1977).When management leaders and conjugation participate cooperatively to resolve problems on a non adversarial basis it improves union management relationship. Involvement often results in the setting of goals and according to Latham, Gary goal setting is often an effective motivational technique, specially when workers set their own goals (1988).Disadvantages of Employee InvolvementHowever, employee involvement had been evaluated as disadvantageous in some ways. Among the disadvantages cited are Employees may be less knowledgeable than managers, and the understanding upon the decisions they make may be different. Aside from this, Jensen and William stated that the rewards motivating workers to share their ideas may be larger than the value of the ideas themselves (1979). Employees may be unenthusiastic to change, once they co mmit to a decision. Employee Involvement is time consuming, and if the groups decided, response to changing environments may be mainly slow. Another concern is the possibility that when a precedent of employee involvement is established, it is baffling to withdraw this right to participate. Organized, participative groups may unite against the management to limit production and avoid change. Sharing information with unions raises their bargaining power, so companies may lose. If the management and union are unified, working together with management may lower unions legitimacy with members. Goals employees set for themselves may be low.In order to better understand employee involvement, it is better if we take a closer look on an organization that allows/promotes employee involvement. One of these organizations is American Water.Employee Involvement in American Water CompanyAs cited in the World Wide Web American Water industrial plant & Guarantee Company was founded in 1886 and wa s restructured in 1947 as American Water Works Company, Inc., and locally operates in New Jersey. Its major mission is to become a trusted water resource company dedicated to