Zheng V. Liberty Apparel Company Inc - 10186 Words

ZHENG v. LIBERTY APPAREL COMPANY INC 88 91 998 103 Ling Nan ZHENG, Ren Zhu Yang, Yun Zhen Huang, Wen Qin Lin, Sai Bing Wang, Ye Biao Yang, Cui Zhen Lin, Rong Yun Zheng, Hui Fang Lin, Xiu Ying Zheng, Jin Ping Lin, Hui Ming Dong, Yu Bing Luo, Sau Chi Kwok, Sai Xian Tang, Yi Zhen Lin, Rui Fang Zhang, Mei Juan Yu, Mei Ying Li, Qin Fang Qiu, Yi Mei Lin, Mei Zhu Dong, Fung Lam, Xiu Zhu Ye, Sing Kei Lam, and Xue Jin Lin, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LIBERTY APPAREL COMPANY INC., Albert Nigri, and Hagai Laniado, Defendants-Cross-Claimants-Appellees, Ngon Fong Yuen, 88 Fashion Inc., Top Five Sportswear, Inc., S.P.R. Sportswear, Inc. and 91 Fashion, Inc., Defendants, Lai Huen Yam, a/k/a Steven Yam, 998 Fashions, Inc. and 103 Fashion Inc.,†¦show more content†¦Because the Contractor Defendants either could not be located or have ceased doing business, plaintiffs have voluntarily dismissed their claims against those defendants with prejudice. Accordingly, plaintiffs now seek damages only from the Liberty Defendants. Liberty, a â€Å"jobber† in the parlance of the garment industry, is a manufacturing company that contracts out the last phase of its production process. That process, in broad terms, worked as follows: First, Liberty employees developed a pattern for a garment, cut a sample from the pattern, and sent the sample to a customer for approval. Once the customer approved the pattern, Liberty purchased the necessary fabric from a vendor, and the vendor delivered the fabric to Libertys warehouse. There, the fabric was graded and marked, spread out on tables, and, finally, cut by Liberty employees. After the fabric was cut, Liberty did not complete the production process on its own premises. Instead, Liberty delivered the cut fabric, along with other essential materials, to various contractors for assembly. The assemblers, in turn, employed workers to stitch and finish the pieces, a process that included sewing the fabrics, buttons, and labels into the garments, cuffing and hemming the garments, and, finally, hanging the garments. The workers, including plaintiffs, were paid at a piece rate for their labor. From March 1997 through April 1999, Liberty enteredShow MoreRelatedThe Case Of Nino V. The Jewelry Exchange Essay970 Words   |  4 PagesIn the case of Nino v. The Jewelry Exchange, there were allegations brought forth by Rajae Nino who felt he was discriminated against by his former employer, on the account of his gender and national origin. When he was employed with said employer, he was given a copy of the company’s employment contract by the human resources manager and instructed him to read it and sign it without affording him any opportunity to negotiate over its terms. With most discrimination cases, â€Å"the EEOC encouragesRead MoreSmall Businesses Are Essential For The Fabric Of The American Economy Essay1326 Words   |  6 Pageslike the threat that faces most business owners is a sizeable one. In August of 2015, the National Labor Relations Board released it’s long awaited decision regarding joint employement in connecting to the Browning-Ferris Indust ries of Pennsylvania, Inc. issue. In an unprecedented move, one that overturned their previous decisions and threatens to upend the basis of franchisor/fanchisee relationships the board decided that in order to find that two or more entities are joint employers of a singleRead MoreWhat Are the Impacts of Rfid in Oil and Gas Supply Chain Management?21195 Words   |  85 Pages3) That this declaration is provided to the best of my knowledge and believes. Signed___________________________________ Justin Executive Summary One of the greatest phenomenon in business today is the zeal by companies, especially in the manufacturing and retail industry to gain competitive advantage through innovation and technology that can bring about reduction in cost and fast delivery while also monitoring product visibility in the supply chain. This can only